Summary
The historical record is unclear, but it is possible that the first
European epidemics were of bubonic plague.
Plague originated in the arid steppes of central Asia. There the
plague bacterium lived in ecological balance with the
resident wild rodent population. It appears that the Mongols - who
frequented this region - had internalized some notion of how
plague was spread. In particular, they had a taboo to never touch
the body of a dead rodent. This, along with their relative
lack of urbanization, probably served them well in avoiding
infection with the disease.
The plague began to spread in ancient times. Incited by
ecological disruption of the grasslands and following
the trade routes west and south, it appears that the plague first reached Europe
in about 2,500 years ago. Unfortunately, the taboos did not spread
with the bacterium; ancient people had no notion of where the disease
came from or how to deal with it. This, along with their high
urbanization, was a recipe for disaster.
Athens was hit in the summer of 430 BCE. Thucydides recorded its
dire effects, and suffered from it himself. The plague devastated
the city and was a major contributing factor in its defeat by Sparta.
(Note: it's not completely certain that the epidemic of 430 BCE was,
in fact, plague. Not all the symptoms line up, in particular the
evident direct spread person-to-person. Even so, the best guess
is that it was plague, perhaps the pneumonic form)
But there is no doubt that plague then hit Rome in the subsequent
centuries. And plague was instrumental in the empire's eventual
downfall. Among other things, the army was depopulated, leading
to increasing reliance on barbarian mercenary troops. And the
elite was also badly hit, even thought the plague originally
started in the roman slums and initially primarily affected poorer parts
of the population.
Indeed, Rome was particularly vulnerable to highly infectious diseases
of this sort. By ancient standards the city was huge. For a long
time the urban population exceeded one million people. Further,
even by ancient standards, most
of this population lived in crowded and sub-standard
conditions. Tenements were usually crowded and
badly constructed, with poor light and even
worse sanitation. A survey in 50 CE found over 3,500 such buildings
within the urban core. Even worse, the Roman population was famously
diverse and mobile. As the historian Tacitus famously
observed, Rome "that great reservoir and collecting ground
for every kind of depravity" welcomed people from all over the
world. No wonder the city was a hotzone for disease.
Because of this the wealthy usually preferred their rural manors.
It was well-known that a man lived far longer and healthier if
he avoided Rome and spent as much time as possible in his country estate.
Bubonic plague receded, not to be seen again until the
Black Death.
But over the intervening centuries Europe was hit by a number of other
plagues.
Given Europe's geographical position (exposed to migrations and invasions from
both Asia and Africa) and its high-density urban
environments and trading culture, European
populations suffered heavily from epidemic disease.
Smallpox,
in particular, was very devastating. Other diseases also had impact.
Measles, whooping cough (pertussis) and typhoid fever all inflicted great mortality.
Some other diseases killed fewer people and yet left more profound scars
on the collective consciousness.
Hansen's Disease
(leprosy) is a good example. This disfiguring bacterium probably
originated in Egypt, spreading to India by 600 B.C. But leprosy was apparently unknown in
Europe until the return of Alexander the Great's armies
from India in 326 B.C. Starting in Greece the bacterium rapidly spread throughout
the continent. By the time of the Roman Empire leprosy was already considered
ancient and was widely feared and discussed. The Bible mentions it no less than 56 times.
Interestingly, leprosy appears to have become less lethal over time. This pattern
is not uncommon. As evolution proceeds it is often the case that pathogens and
their hosts become more tolerant of each other. Even though the pathogenic microorganism
remains, it exhibits less disease and lethality. Modern Europeans are largely
immune to leprosy whereas populations which have had less historic exposure - such as
Asians - suffer from it to a greater extent.
Thus while
destructive of countless lives through history, this constant
exposure to novel pathogens did grant Europeans one advantage: they eventually built
relative immunity to many of the great epidemic diseases that afflicted
our species. Thus, as European colonial powers moved outward after the
15th century, they usually introduced new diseases to non-European populations,
rather than the reverse. Since the non-European populations did not
have natural immunity to these new diseases, the result was often a
demographic disaster.
Syphilis was the great exception. Brought back to Europe after the
Columbus expeditions, it ravaged Europe for centuries. Like leprosy, however,
it gradually diminished in severity as the human population and the virus co-evolved some
level of tolerance. Today syphilis remains a serious disease, but is not
nearly as lethal as it was a few centuries ago.
Link: Plague Fatally Weakens Rome
Link: Thucydides Primary Report On The Athenian Plague
Link: History Of Infectious Disease
Link: Examples of How Disease Altered History
Link: Bacterial History
Link: The Effects Of The Black Death On Europe
Link: The History Of Leprosy
Link: The Columbian Exchange - And Syphilis Emerges In Europe.
|